Digital image sharpening may be the most complicated subject for digital photographers; perhaps even more complicated than color management. Nevertheless, The Digital Photo Experience has tackled the issue in their Sharpening Saturday Lightroom tip. And so I’ll work to translate their points into Aperture here — their format is video, mine will be text and images.
The sharpening controls are very different between the two programs even though they are attempting to do pretty much the same things.
Intensity is the same as Amount; both are sliders for “how much” sharpening to apply. Aperture’s Edges slider works somewhat like Lightroom’s masking in that it defines what gets sharpened; how much of the detail in an image is to be considered an “edge.”. The adjustment brick is entitled edge sharpening because that’s what Aperture wants to work on — edges. The Falloff slider is much like Lightroom’s Radius control as it determines how far away from an edge the sharpening effect is applied.
The reasons to use sharpening and the thought process behind how to apply it is, of course, the same for both programs because what we’re trying to do in both cases is to post-process digital images. You always what to work at 100% image magnification to best judge the effects of sharpening.
One way the two are different is in the number of places in the RAW processing pipeline at which sharpening is applied.
Aperture’s first sharpening adjustment is made right as the RAW image is first translated. You can see that adjustment in the RAW Fine Tuning adjustment brick. This is where Aperture is correcting for the slight blurring created by the anti-alaising filter in front of the camera’s digital image sensor.
After that, the Edge Sharpening adjustment brick kicks in. Different adjustments here are appropriate for different images. Typically “high detail” images, such as landscapes and architecture, need higher intensities with more of the image defined as an edge. “Low detail” images, especially of people, would need lower intensity sharpening with less of the image defined as an edge.
Another type of sharpening is often called creative sharpening and is done to draw the viewer’s attention to certain parts of the image. Often this sharpening might be to the eyes of the subject. To apply this sharpening in Aperture, you can use the new Quick Adjustment Brush called Sharpen. What I prefer to do, however, is to add another edge sharpen adjustment brick because I have more control using the Intensity, Edges and Falloff sliders.
The final stage of sharpening is called output sharpening because it makes adjustments to account for the media used for output. Matte type photo papers tend to bleed ink slightly more than glossy photo papers and so need a bit more output sharpening to compensate. The screen is a poor image display compared to a good photo paper and has much less resolution, so more sharpening is needed. Aperture does not output sharpen except as part of the print dialog.
Here the sliders are Amount for “how much” sharpening you want and Radius for how far away from an edge to effect.


Hi, thanks for this great article.
So, if I adjust (sharpen) my photo’s in Aperture and export them to JPG. I will not see my results in the exported file? Can you please explain me a little bit more. Why should I sharpen an image if I can’t export it for printing?
Thnx.
Bas
If you sharpen and export to JPEG, your sharpening will go too. So if you are going to send JPEGs to a print service, you’ll be fine. You just can’t use the sharpening tools in the print dialog — but you won’t be using that if you’re sending off to a print service.
Bob
Thnx, I was wondering because if I edit a photo in aperture with the sharpen tool, the image looks different in the edit mode from the photo I exported in JPG. But on the other side, If I zoom to 100% the difference is much less than viewing the image fitted in the screen in Aperture, so I think it has to do with the resolution of my screen? But the exported JPG photo, when also fitted in screen is still different from the one in Aperture. Strange.
Compare at 100%. I’d expect little visible difference (unless the JPEG compression is very high and then you might be seeing compression artifacts).
Bob