Image
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Portfolio

PocketWizard vs. RadioPopper For Canon eTTL

13 Nov
Filed Under: Opinion, Photography

Canon’s E-TTL system for exposure control of their speedlites using rapid flashes of light before the main flash is very popular and very capable. But it does have it’s limits, espe­cially it’s use in bright outside light or over long distances. Radio signals are the answer and have already been used in the widely popular PocketWizard Plus II and MultiMAX manual flash triggers as well as several other systems such as those from Paul Buff (CyberSync) and RadioPopper (JrX).

On a couple of recent shoots I’ve run up against some of the Canon remote (off camera) E-TTL limits, started looking into the newer radio signal TTL systems and found that there are exactly two for Canon speedlites — the RadioPopper PX and the PocketWizard MiniTT1/FlexTT5. Perhaps because this approach is somewhat new, there are tremendous differ­ences between them and some compro­mises to be made with either. I thought I’d summarize my findings here for those who may also be interested.

RadioPopper PX

RadioPopper PX Transmitter

These guys were first into the game. Their approach is to capture the pre-flash light signals Canon uses to control their Speedlites remotely, translate them into radio signals, broadcast those radio signals to their receivers, decode the signals and then relay them as light flashes into the Canon Speedlite sensor.

RadioPopper PX Receiver

To accom­plish all that, the RadioPopper PX trans­mitter is connected with velco to the top of a master speedlite (or the Canon ST-E2) mounted on the camera and the receiver unit is attached to the front of the remote speedlite(s) with a special bracket that connects to the speedlite’s hot shoe. It’s important that the remote(s) not receive any of the light flashes from the master unit, so a sticker is applied over the speedlite’s sensor with a single hole to allow the receiver to flash its signals into it.

The result is that the RadioPopper PX system works exactly like Canon’s off camera control system with all its features. You end up with a long-range, light insen­sitive version, so there’s little to learn.

The RadioPopper options are set with an LCD display, two colored LEDs, and a pair of buttons on the unit.

Prices

  • PX Receiver: $249
  • PX Transmitter: $249

RadioPopper PX Receiver Mounted To A Speedlite

Pros

  • Simple and reliable
  • Duplicates Canon’s own system, just using radio communication
  • Long (around 1,500 feet) range
  • Can control the RadioPopper JrX receivers, if you already have those

Cons

  • Requires an on-camera controller (Speedlite or ST-E2)
  • Cannot operate as a remote camera trigger
  • While the trans­mitter will work with the Canon 7D popup Speedlite controller, RadioPopper does not make a bracket to mount it — its a DYI project for the user
  • Ends up being a bulky addition at the camera and at the Speedlite
  • Some have complained that the two button interface is a little too spartan
PocketWizard MiniTT1/FlexTT5

PocketWizard MiniTT1

The folks at PocketWizard have taken a different approach from RadioPopper in that they intercept the elec­tronic signals between the camera and the on-camera flash (Canon’s E-TTL “language”), translate that into their own ControlTL (Control The Light) “language,” transmit those signals via radio to a receiver, translate ControlTL back into Canon E-TTL, and pass that to the speedlite though its hot shoe connection.

The MiniTT1 is only a trans­mitter and is intended for use on the camera. The FlexTT5 is a trans­ceiver and so can work on the camera or the speedlites. Both attach via Canon’s hot shoe connec­tions. And both are sophis­ti­cated devices that run firmware upgradable via USB connection from your computer. Many settings for that firmware are also adjusted using the USB interface and software on the host computer.

Prices

  • MiniTT1 receiver: $200
  • FlexTT5 transceiver:$230
  • AC3 zone controller: $70
  • AC5 soft RF shield: $18
  • AC7 hard RF shield: $38

PocketWizard FlexTT5

Pros

  • Does not require an on-camera controller
  • PocketWizard a well-known and estab­lished remote speedlite control company
  • Expands the Canon E-TTL control set to create new features such as PocketWizard’s HyperSync which allows increased sync speeds without going all the way to Canon’s high speed sync
  • Using an AC3 zone controller, you can have full control of three light zones — Canon’s E-TTL only allows that for two zones; their zone ‘C’ is only manual
  • Can control the PocketWizard Plus II and MultiMAX manual speedlite triggers, if your already have those
  • The FlexTT5 can be used as a remote camera trigger

PocketWizard AC3 RF Shield And FlexTT5 Transmitter Mounted On A Speedlite

Cons

  • Radio Frequency (RF) inter­ference produced by many of Canon’s speedlites (espe­cially the 430EX, 580EX and 580EX II) greatly inter­feres with the range and reli­a­bility of the MiniTT1/FlexTT5 system. So much so that PocketWizard offers their AC5 and AC7 RF shields allowing greater, but not great, range for those Canon speedlites. Its surprising, you would expect that their early product testing would have exposed this. The Canon 430EX II is known to be a low RF inter­ference unit and will work best.
  • There are persistent reports on the Internet of damage caused to Canon 580 series speedlites and easily broken MiniTT1/FlexTT5 hot shoe connec­tions. These reports are very hard to evaluate fairly, but even those well written by iden­tified authors are frequent enough to raise a concern. PocketWizard’s reply to my email did not deny problems, but only said they were working with Canon to verify them.
  • Canon only, now. A Nikon system is in the works.

In the end, its a difficult choice and will depend on many of the photographer’s personal needs. PocketWizard’s system is more compact and sophis­ti­cated but, for me, the potential damage from and to the PocketWizard compo­nents is a show stopper. And the restric­tions in range for many Canon speedlites (20 feet without the RF shields, 100 feet with them, according to PocketWizard) is severe for those working at more than typical studio ranges. If I must have a system before PocketWizard improves theirs, I’ll be going with the RadioPoppers.

For another take on these two systems, see Syl Arena’s excellent Speedliting website and its section on remote speedlite control.

Comments

  1. George Hausler says:
    March 17, 2011 at 8:19 PM

    “There have been complaints about the Canon 580 EX II flash being damaged seri­ously by the use of PocketWizard FlexTT5 and MiniTT1 for a while. The flash would no longer output controlled amounts of light but only output full power dumps, even on a pre?flash, photog­ra­phers reported.”

    After just 20 test shots with my canon 580 EX II I had the same expe­rience. Needless to say, I am not happy. I now need to have my flash repaired, and since I just started shoot weddings, I am going to have to buy another one. I will be returning both the PocketWizard FlexTT5 and MiniTT1. Shame on PocketWizard for not making this known!

    Reply
    • bobrocke says:
      March 18, 2011 at 10:13 AM

      I’m sorry to hear that. And I agree that this problem does not seem to be getting much media attention, nor does an otherwise very dependable company really acknowledge the issue. The RadioPoppers have been working well for me and I now have 3 receivers to go with the trans­mitter. Recommended.

      Bob

      Reply
      • George Hausler says:
        September 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM

        Here’s an update on the issue with the 580 EX II. They (pocket wizard) did an analysis on the the problem with the 580 EX II and found that the flash tubes in some of the units are misaligned. They see a failure rate of about 1 in 200 580 EX II using their trans­mitters. High speed sync puts a lot of stress on the flash, and causes the flashes with misaligned flash tubes to fail quickly. You can see arcing from the flash tube to the reflector in the units where the flash tube is misaligned. They realigned the flash tube and replaced the failed component for a very reasonable price. Because of the profes­sional manner in which they dealt with me, I decided to give them another chance, and have not had a problem the the trans­mitters or flashes since. I have stayed away from using the high speed sync with their trans­mitters just as a precaution though.

        Reply
        • Bob Rockefeller says:
          September 20, 2011 at 9:01 AM

          Thanks for the update. Does the 580 EX have the same misaligned failure problem?

          Reply
  2. Ameed El-Ghoul says:
    May 16, 2011 at 5:51 PM

    So the best two choices are bad :(
    I was hoping to go with the PocketWizard, but honestly, who wants a condom on his flash. A hard condom horizently, and a range that doesn’t cover a basketball frield.

    At the opposite, I don’t require on camera flash all the time, but if went with Radio popper I will have to have one always on access, or by the Canon ST-E2 which coasts $350?!!! The over all price to upgade to RP will be .. outchhhhhhhhhh

    Reply
  3. Jay says:
    June 16, 2011 at 2:34 AM

    What makes you think that you need an on-camera controller such as the ST-E2 for the PX, I don’t see that anywhere. And I don’t see anything about that for the JrX pkg either. Can you point to a page on the RadioPopper site that mentions it? Thank you for a great review.

    Jay at phodoz dot com
    –Thanks again!

    Reply
    • Bob Rockefeller says:
      June 16, 2011 at 7:27 PM

      You don’t have to have an ST-E2; you could use a EX580 (or the like). But you will need some­thing on the camera to trigger the remotes.

      Bob

      Reply
  4. Al says:
    February 19, 2012 at 11:35 PM

    i feel i have jumped into this analysis a bit late. i have run with PW for over 3 years, through many wedding and event shoots. ALL of the cons for them have happened to us. many broken hot shoes (in fact none of my PWs tighten anymore), wrestled with canon over broken 580EX II caused by PW, many many many misfires due to radio frequency, frus­trated with the goofy sock shield to make adjust­ments on flashes (in front of clients). on-site shoots i would NOT recommend PW.
    having a master or st-e2 is hardly a con for the RP. seeing that you only need to velcro a transmit onto a master was actually a pro for me. if you want to control an on camera and an off camera flash with PW you end up with this very top heavy tower on top of your camera, trusting that PW’s cheap plastic shoe doesnt break.
    however, PW may be great for in-studio due to lots of control and less moving around.
    i wish i could switch over to RP. i would sell all my PW in a heart beat.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Who Is Bob Rockefeller?

I’m a pho­tog­ra­pher and a Macintosh user who shoots what catches my eye and tries to remember David duChemin’s credo: “Gear is Good. Vision is Better.” I also dabble in HTML, CSS and WordPress coding. [Read More …]

My Other Sites

  • Bob Rockefeller Photography
  • My 500px Portfolio
  • My Facebook Page
  • My Pixoto Page

Blogging Shooters

  • David duChemin
  • David Hobby
  • Derrick Story
  • Joe McNally
  • John Thawley
  • Martin Bailey
  • Robert Boyer
  • Scott Kelby

Links To Good Gear

  • Apple
  • B&H
  • FlashZebra
  • Other World Computing

Popular Posts

  • Sublime Text 2 Is Really Good
  • Some Custom Squarespace CSS Code
  • Organizing in Aperture: An Example
  • Finding A Photo Sales Site
  • PocketWizard vs. RadioPopper for Nikon

Categories

  • Admin
  • Aperture
  • Business
  • Lightroom
  • Macintosh
  • Opinion
  • Photography
  • Printing
  • Translating Lightroom
  • Web Development

Copyright © 2008–2013 Bob Rockefeller • Custom theme on the Builder Framework by iThemes • WordPress • Log in