Pixelmator For Photographers?

Pixelmator ScreenPixelmator is a won­derful little $60 pixel editor for Macintosh. I men­tioned Pixelmator briefly some time ago when it was in ver­sion 1.2 and I thought I should spend a little more time dis­cussing it now (its at ver­sion 1.6, today). In par­tic­ular I wanted to attempt to answer a question—is Pixelmator ready to be your photo editor? Many pho­tog­ra­phers are using Aperture or Lightroom (I use Aperture) and have access to many image adjust­ment tools, but for those times that a pixel editor is nec­es­sary, could it be Pixelmator? Or do we need to stay with the tried and true, and expen­sive, Photoshop?

The Case For “Yes”

Pixelmator's ToolsI can cer­tainly be a dis­cus­sion point as to just what tools are nec­es­sary for a pixel editor to be used as an adjunct to a photo work­flow appli­ca­tion such as Aperture. From my per­spec­tive, Pixelmator has a great many of what I con­sider to be necessary.

Let’s make a laundry list of the pri­mary pho­to­graphic tools in Pixelmator:

  • The basics: expo­sure, levels, curves, hue. sat­u­ra­tion, bright­ness, contrast
  • Brushes with lots of options
  • Full 64-bit archetecture
  • Layers with blending modes, opacity, masks and layer groups
  • Plenty of fil­ters such as Gaussian Blur, Unsharp Mask and Halftone Screens
  • Powerful selec­tion tools including the Magic Wand
  • Selection mod­i­fi­ca­tion tools such as feather, expand and contract
  • Support for pres­sure sen­si­tive graphics tablets
  • Open and saves over 100 image formats
  • There’s even a Quick Mask mode!

As a bonus, Pixelmator has a modern Macintosh inter­face that lever­ages many of the Mac OS’s core tools such that it blends right in and looks and works like a first class Macintosh cit­izen. That may be a bit sub­jec­tive, but the “feel” of one’s tools is impor­tant, too.

The Case For “No”

But make no mis­take, Pixelmator is not Photoshop. And in a few areas, its not even Photoshop Elements, its prime com­pe­ti­tion for pho­tog­ra­phers looking for some­thing less expen­sive and less inti­mating than Photoshop.

Pixelmator's Layer PalleteThere are a few key things missing for photographers:

  • High pass filter
  • Healing brush or patch tool
  • Adjustment layers
  • 16-bit image processing
  • There is only rudi­men­tary local­ized sharpening
  • Huge sup­port com­mu­nity and resources
Enough?

At $60 dol­lars Pixelmator needs to make a very strong case against the $78 Photoshop Elements. After all, Photoshop Elements is the scaled down ver­sion of Photoshop and is Adobe’s pitch to pho­tog­ra­phers not ready for the expense and com­plexity of Photoshop. Photoshop Elements does not handle 16-bit image pro­cessing, but it covers the other missing tools in Pixelmator.

My ver­dict? Pixelmator is not yet ready; as smooth and Mac-like as it is. Photoshop Elements makes a better buy for its fea­tures, even at a few dol­lars more. Pixelmator is still in active devel­op­ment and new ver­sions are released with some reg­u­larity, so its a little hard to guess what ver­sion 1.7 Geneva or even 2.0 (both now in process) will be bringing for pho­tog­ra­phers. If it could pick up the missing items I high­lighted, it will make a great pixel editor for photographers.

Black and White Conversions

The Power of Black and WhiteCraft & Vision has released another in their series of excel­lent pho­tog­raphy related e-books. This one is enti­tled The Power of Black and White, by Piet Van den Eynde, and fea­tures the use of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom for con­verting color images to black and white. And that explains the sub-title In Adobe Lightroom and Beyond.

But I use Apple’s Aperture, and I know many of you do, too. So I’d like to give you an overview of Piet’s book and ‘trans­late’ some of his points into tech­niques Aperture users can apply. I think this is appro­priate as a great deal of the book is about how to work with black and white con­ver­sions in gen­eral and only parts it rely on Lightroom. Even if you are an Aperture user, I think you will ben­efit from his book. And its just $5—don’t pass it up if you do any black and white work to speak of.

Chapter 1 begins by pro­viding some good tips on cap­turing images intended for black and white con­ver­sion. Chapter 2 goes into a little of the theory of color and how it applies in this con­text. Its in Chapter 3 that we first see Lightroom and only as an intro­duc­tion to its black and white tools. Many of these same tools appear in Aperture, but with dif­ferent names or arrangement.

Aperture's Basic Adjustments

Aperture’s Basic Adjustments

The tools pre­sented and their Aperture equiv­a­lents are:

  • Exposure = Exposure
  • Black Point = Black Point
  • Fill Light = Shadows
  • Highlight Recovery = Recovery
  • Brightness = Brightness
  • Clarity = Definition
  • Contrast = Contrast
  • Tone Curve =  Curves

So far, Aperture has, for all prac­tical pur­poses, iden­tical tools. But at this point Piet intro­duces Lightroom’s Targeted Adjustment Tool (or TAT), a con­cept that has no match in Aperture. Using the TAT as part of the Tone Curve adjust­ment, for example, lets you click on the image and drag up to lighten, or down to darken, what­ever tone is found under the mouse click. This is really very clever and can also be used in color selec­tion, as we’ll shortly see.

Lightroom's Graduated Filter

Lightroom’s Graduated Filter

Moving on we learn about more tools:

  • Temperature = Temperature
  • Tint = Tint
  • Post-Crop Vignette = Vignette
  • Presets = Presets

Again, near per­fect  matches. And, once again, a split—Aperture has no par­allel to Lightroom’s Grain and Graduated Filter tools. Lightroom’s Adjustment Brush is a com­bi­na­tion of sev­eral dif­ferent brushed on adjust­ment bricks in Aperture. In Lightroom you can brush on Exposure, Brightness, Contrast, Saturation, Clarity and Sharpness (Exposure, Brightness, Contrast, Saturation, Definition, and Sharpen for Aperture). Of course Aperture goes Lightroom one better here with the ability to brush in, or brush out, nearly any adjust­ment, even Curves.

The first case study of the book is pre­sented next. Here we learn about how changing the lumi­nance of dif­ferent colors change the apparent bright­ness of the grays those colors are con­verted to in black and white. Lightroom pro­vides sliders for eight colors (Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Aqua, Blue, Purple and Magenta). Aperture’s color brick offers sliders for six colors (Red, Yellow, Green, Aqua, Blue and Magenta), but you can change any of the pre-determine colors to any of the colors in your image by selecting on the eye­dropper and clicking on that color. Here, again, the TAT in Lightroom is avail­able and it works by moving mul­tiple color sliders based on where you click in the image.

Aperture's RAW Fine Tuning

Aperture’s RAW Fine Tuning

Chapter 4 pro­vides a look at the author’s Lightroom work­flow touching on many of the tools already intro­duced. A few new tools shown are the Camera Profile adjust­ments, which are much like Aperture’s RAW Fine Tuning, and Auto Lens Correction (cor­recting for dis­tor­tion, chro­matic aber­ra­tions and vignetting). Lightroom trumps Aperture here as Aperture has no lens cor­rec­tion ability without resorting to plug-ins.

The second case study is a very long and detailed tuto­rial on how to apply the many tools avail­able to a spe­cific and dif­fi­cult image. All of the work done here can be done with Aperture in many of the same ways. Use the trans­la­tions above and follow along.

Next up is the third case study which uses Photoshop. Since Aperture can round trip to Photoshop just as Lightroom can, there’s no trans­la­tion needed here. Chapter 5 dis­cusses set­ting up and using pre­sets and again the two pro­grams are very sim­ilar in how they handle them. Aperture is a bit more flex­ible, as a preset doesn’t have to wipe out any existing adjust­ments as Lightroom’s do, but you can get the same work done with either.

Silver Efex Pro 2Dodging and Burning are old dark­room tech­niques that are still impor­tant in today’s dig­ital world and Chapter 6 shows how they can be used for black and white work. Aperture has both Dodge and Burn as Quick Brushes, but Lightroom adds the very handy Graduated Filter. Chapter 7 goes out­side of Lightroom to show the use of the plug-ins Exposure (by Alien Skin Software—avail­able for Photoshop and Lightroom) and Silver Efex Pro 2 (by Nik Software—avail­able for Photoshop, Lightroom and Aperture).

High Dynamic Range imaging (per­haps better called Tone Mapping) is very pop­ular now in dig­ital pho­tog­raphy and Chapter 8 dis­cusses its use in black and white. Again, two plug-in are shown, HDR Efex Pro (by Nik Software—available for Photoshop, Lightroom and Aperture, and LR/Enfuse (by Photographer’s Toolbox—avail­able only for Lightroom). The very pop­ular stand­alone pro­gram, Photomatix Pro (byHDRsoft), is also discussed.

Chapter 9 offers some alter­na­tive ideas for fin­ishing your black and white con­ver­sion including Tinting (Color Monochrome in Aperture), Split Toning (no equiv­a­lent in Aperture), Selective Coloring, and adding bor­ders. Chapter 10 com­pletes the book and goes over printing, some­thing it seems that fewer and fewer pho­tog­ra­phers are doing them­selves these days. As should be clear by now, Aperture offers essen­tially the same tools for printing as Lightroom.

So there you have it. This is a great book for those wanting to get into black and white con­ver­sions for some of their color work. I’d rec­om­mend it for either Lightroom or Aperture users.

Why I Use Aperture

This is not another fire starter in the argu­ment between Aperture and Lightroom users. Both pro­grams are fine tools for the pho­tog­ra­pher and using either of them is likely to accom­plish what the user wants. I’ve used Lightroom for a good while myself, but started with Aperture when it first came out. And I’ve written a good bit about why a pho­tog­ra­pher might prefer one over the other. I feel as if I have enough under­standing of both to appre­ciate their finer points.

Lightroom 3 LogoWhich is why I use Aperture. It’s the finer points. It’s not the fea­ture set, nor the com­mu­nity, nor the opin­ions of others. Perhaps having used Macintosh for so long, I’ve become more appre­cia­tive of details done the Macintosh way. Regardless, I thought I’d record my opin­ions and pref­er­ences con­cerning Aperture.

There are some little things about Lightroom that have always driven me crazy and that Aperture has done “right.” And other things about Lightroom that I never could figure out how to work around. Yet, I’ll be the first to admit there are fea­tures in Lightroom that would be very nice to have in Aperture:

Graduated Filter

Lightroom’s Graduated Filter

  • Gradient Adjustments
  • Lens Correction
  • Superior Noise Reduction
  • Faster Adjustments on Lesser Hardware
  • Automated Output Sharpening

But I’m guessing that Lightroom users would really like to have some of Aperture’s features:

  • Multiple Adjustments — apply more than one curve adjust­ment, for example.
  • Book Making
  • Print Making
  • Create Custom Metadata Fields
  • Highlight and Shadow Adjustments

Enough of that. The point is that both pro­grams are pow­er­houses, cover mostly the same ground, but are not exactly the same in how they do it. Here are Aperture’s killer features—for me.

Organization Of Images

Project Example

An Example Project

I love the fact that Aperture can manage all your images within its library folder (which is nothing more than a Macintosh file package—the curious are free to poke around inside it and see their RAW files). This makes pos­sible Aperture’s vault system for making com­plete backups of your image files, adjust­ments, meta­data and albums (including all the spe­cialty albums such as light tables, books, slideshows, etc.).

Aperture’s file struc­ture within its library is com­pletely vir­tual allowing the pho­tog­ra­pher to create folders, projects and albums wher­ever and how­ever it makes sense. Put a smart album inside a project to col­lect all the keepers for that project? No problem. Create a book using images from mul­tiple projects? Also no problem.

The Simple Things Are Simple

A Custom Metadata Display

A Custom Metadata Display

Need to edit the name of a key­word, project or album? Just double click and edit it in place; no extra dialog box needed. If you import an image that already has key­words as meta­data, its a simple thing to merge any dupli­cate key­words into your library’s key­word list. Creating a custom dis­play of meta­data fields is a simple matter of click, drag and drop.

Entering meta­data is easy, too. Type what you need and tab to the next field. Simple, and no need for mul­tiple tabs. There are some handy Aperture spe­cific meta­data fields, too, such as aspect ratio and ori­en­ta­tion. And you can make as many of your own fields as you want.

Double click to see a larger ver­sion of an image and just start using the tools in the adjust­ments panel with no need to switch modes. Bring up the very clever and useful loupe tool anywhere—while making adjust­ments, preparing an image for printing, or in a book layout. Anywhere you can see the image, you can use the loupe tool to zoom in on it.

Cropping in Aperture just makes sense to me. If you need to move the crop, move the crop box, don’t move the image. Once you’ve set the crop and want to change the aspect ratio, picking a new aspect ratio starts around the same crop as you already have, it doesn’t reset it.

Extra Goodness

Some fea­tures are just too good not to crow about. Adding loca­tion meta­data couldn’t be much easier. The Assign Location… com­mand brings up a dialog box with a Google map dis­play to find the loca­tion and click on the map. Done. It saves your favorite places, too.

Integration with all things Apple is not too sur­prising as Aperture is an Apple pro­fes­sional product. But its nice, nonethe­less that it easily and seam­lessly con­nects to my MobileMe gallery, appli­ca­tions such as Pages and Numbers, or even links up with my iPhone or iPad.

Repair Brush Tool

Repair Brush Tool

I could start another argu­ment on the value of soft proofing. Photoshop and Aperture have it, Lightroom does not. But let’s not argue; I like soft proofing in some cases and Aperture lets me choose to use it, or not.

It has often been thought that Adobe has to bal­ance Lightroom’s fea­ture set with Photoshop’s so they retain their own places in Adobe’s hier­archy of prod­ucts. I don’t know. But I know that the repair brush adjust­ment in Aperture is much more like Photoshop’s than Lightroom’s and it is very powerful.

Sum It Up

Taken all together, Aperture lets me do the things I do most often quickly, easily and smoothly. No muss, no fuss. There are some things it doesn’t do that Lightroom does, but that’s OK. They aren’t things I do often and if need to do them, I can choose from a number of edit plug-ins or the king of all image editing plug-ins, Photoshop.